{"id":5773,"date":"2026-04-16T19:21:05","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T13:51:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/"},"modified":"2026-06-10T04:37:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T11:37:43","slug":"change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/","title":{"rendered":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach"},"content":{"rendered":"

Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach<\/h1>\n

Change management strategy vs ticket sprawl is not a tooling debate. It is a governance problem. IT and operations teams often create more tickets, more queues, more request types, and more status updates in an attempt to control change, but the result can be fragmented execution, unclear decision rights, weak approval evidence, and leadership reports that arrive too late.<\/p>\n

For CIOs, service owners, PMOs, quality leaders, and consulting firms, the real question is how change should be governed from request to decision to implementation to closure. Ticket volume may show activity, but it does not prove that change risk, business impact, financial effect, owner accountability, and approval control are being managed.<\/p>\n

Why ticket sprawl happens<\/h2>\n

Ticket sprawl happens when every team creates its own way to capture work. Incidents, service requests, change requests, access requests, vendor issues, release tasks, audit findings, and improvement ideas may all become separate queues. Each queue has a local owner, local fields, local status values, and local reports.<\/p>\n

At first this feels practical. Teams get a place to record work. Over time, leadership loses the ability to see which tickets are operational noise, which represent governed changes, which need approval, which have financial impact, which carry risk, and which belong to a larger transformation program.<\/p>\n

In IT service management<\/a>, this distinction matters. A ticket can record a request, but a change management strategy must define how the request is assessed, approved, scheduled, implemented, validated, and reported.<\/p>\n

What a real change management strategy controls<\/h2>\n

A practical change management strategy controls decision quality. It should define which changes require formal approval, which evidence is needed, who can approve, which risks must be reviewed, how implementation readiness is confirmed, and how closure is documented.<\/p>\n

It also controls business context. A change may affect customer service, compliance quality systems, cost, security, data, process design, service availability, or employee capacity. If the ticket only says a change is open or closed, leadership may miss the business impact behind it.<\/p>\n

Good change governance should also distinguish between routine service work and strategic measures. A password reset is not the same as a service catalog redesign. A minor configuration update is not the same as a core workflow change. A release task is not the same as a cost reduction measure that requires finance validation.<\/p>\n

Signs that tickets are replacing governance<\/h2>\n

The first sign is status inflation. Teams create status labels such as pending, waiting, in review, blocked, reopened, deferred, and done, but the labels do not explain what decision is needed. The organization has more status language but less control.<\/p>\n

The second sign is approval ambiguity. A change may be discussed in a meeting, confirmed in an email, and updated in a ticket, but the official approval trail is unclear. This becomes a problem during audit review, service failure analysis, or executive escalation.<\/p>\n

The third sign is weak linkage to projects and programs. A change ticket may be part of a larger transformation, cost initiative, quality improvement, or portfolio project. If the ticket is not connected to the parent initiative, leadership cannot see the full execution picture.<\/p>\n

The fourth sign is manual reporting. Analysts export tickets, clean fields, reconcile status values, and rebuild slides for governance meetings. The ticket system holds activity data, but it does not provide the governed management view leaders need.<\/p>\n

The fifth sign is closure without value confirmation. A ticket can be closed because work was performed, even if the expected operational or financial benefit was not confirmed. That is not a change strategy. It is an activity log.<\/p>\n

How to reduce ticket sprawl without losing control<\/h2>\n

The answer is not to delete useful ticket workflows. The answer is to separate operational capture from governance control. Some tickets should remain local operational records. Important changes should become governed measures with owners, sponsors, approval gates, risk context, financial impact where relevant, and reporting visibility.<\/p>\n

For example, a service desk can keep request tickets for routine access and support work. A major access redesign can be governed as a measure with business owner, IT owner, approval criteria, implementation plan, risk review, user impact, and closure evidence. A release queue can manage technical tasks. A platform migration can be governed as a project with budget, milestones, dependencies, steering committee decisions, and executive reporting.<\/p>\n

This is also relevant for quality management system<\/a> workflows. Findings, corrective actions, document reviews, audit trails, and change approvals need traceability. A ticket alone may not provide the governance structure needed for controlled quality execution.<\/p>\n

Where financial and capacity control fit<\/h2>\n

Change consumes money and people. A practical change management strategy should show which changes require investment approval, which require budget updates, which create recurring support cost, and which need capacity review. It should also show whether the team has the skills and availability to execute without creating service risk.<\/p>\n

Examples include a change that increases cloud cost, a workflow redesign that needs consultant support, a service catalog update that changes support demand, a system enhancement that requires training, or a process change that reduces recurring manual work. These are not just tickets. They are business decisions.<\/p>\n

For organizations managing multiple service and change initiatives, multi project management<\/a> discipline helps leaders see which changes compete for the same resources, which dependencies are unresolved, and which approvals are blocking progress.<\/p>\n

How Cataligent Helps Through CAT4<\/h2>\n

Cataligent helps enterprise teams and consulting firms move from ticket sprawl to governed change execution through CAT4, its no code strategy execution platform. Cataligent does not need to position CAT4 as a direct replacement for dedicated ITSM tools unless the scope is formally confirmed. The more accurate role is that Cataligent can help structure change governance, service workflows, approvals, reporting, and execution control where clients need a governed operating layer.<\/p>\n

CAT4 supports configurable workflows, event triggered alerts, email based approvals, multi level approval processes, implementation readiness approvals, change request management, history management, audit log, role based access, and management ready reports. These capabilities help important changes move through controlled stages rather than disappearing inside ticket queues.<\/p>\n

CAT4 can also connect change work to portfolios, programs, projects, measure packages, and measures. This matters when a change is part of a larger business transformation, cost saving program, IT service improvement, or quality initiative. Leaders can see not only ticket closure, but status, potential, financial impact, risks, and decisions needed.<\/p>\n

For consulting firms, Cataligent can help configure CAT4 around the firm’s methodology so client change programs have repeatable governance, steering committee reporting, and controlled closure. For enterprise teams, it creates a clearer line between operational tickets and governed execution.<\/p>\n

Use tickets for work capture and governance for change control<\/h2>\n

Tickets are useful, but they are not a complete change management strategy. The organization needs a way to decide which changes matter, how they are approved, what value they create, how risks are escalated, and when closure is valid. That is how teams reduce ticket sprawl without losing operational detail.<\/p>\n

Trying to bring control to change work, service requests, approvals, and leadership reporting? Speak with Cataligent about how CAT4 can support governed change execution and service workflow reporting.<\/p>\n

FAQs<\/h2>\n

Q. What is ticket sprawl in change management?<\/h3>\n

Ticket sprawl happens when many queues, request types, and local workflows record activity without a clear governance structure. It makes it difficult to see which changes need approval, risk review, financial control, or executive attention.<\/p>\n

Q. Should every ticket become a governed change measure?<\/h3>\n

No, routine service tickets can remain operational records. Important changes should be governed as measures when they carry risk, financial impact, cross functional dependencies, or leadership decisions.<\/p>\n

Q. How does Cataligent help reduce ticket sprawl through CAT4?<\/h3>\n

Cataligent helps teams use CAT4 to structure important changes with owners, approvals, stage gates, risks, dependencies, and reports. CAT4 can connect change work to wider transformation, ITSM, quality, or portfolio governance where needed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach Change management strategy vs ticket sprawl is not a tooling debate. It is a governance problem. IT and operations teams often create more tickets, more queues, more request types, and more status updates in an attempt to control change, but the result can be fragmented execution, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2104],"tags":[2033,568,632,1739,2107,1967,2106,2105],"class_list":["post-5773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-strategy-planning","tag-business-strategy","tag-cost-reduction-strategies","tag-cost-reduction-strategy","tag-digital-strategy","tag-planning","tag-strategic-decision-making","tag-strategic-planning","tag-strategy-planning"],"yoast_head":"\nChange Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach Change management strategy vs ticket sprawl is not a tooling debate. It is a governance problem. IT and operations teams often create more tickets, more queues, more request types, and more status updates in an attempt to control change, but the result can be fragmented execution, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cataligent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"cat_admin_usr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cataligentindia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cataligentindia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"cat_admin_usr\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"cat_admin_usr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756\"},\"headline\":\"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1323,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Business Strategy\",\"Cost Reduction Strategies\",\"Cost Reduction Strategy\",\"Digital Strategy\",\"Planning\",\"Strategic Decision-Making\",\"Strategic Planning\",\"Strategy Planning\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Strategy Planning\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/\",\"name\":\"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/strategy-planning\\\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/\",\"description\":\"Strategy Execution Tool for Cost Saving Program\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/01\\\/logoColored-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/01\\\/logoColored-1.png\",\"width\":296,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cataligentindia\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/cataligentstrategy\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/cataligentindia\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756\",\"name\":\"cat_admin_usr\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"cat_admin_usr\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/cat_admin_usr\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent","og_description":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach Change management strategy vs ticket sprawl is not a tooling debate. It is a governance problem. IT and operations teams often create more tickets, more queues, more request types, and more status updates in an attempt to control change, but the result can be fragmented execution, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/","og_site_name":"Cataligent","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00","author":"cat_admin_usr","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@cataligentindia","twitter_site":"@cataligentindia","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"cat_admin_usr","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/"},"author":{"name":"cat_admin_usr","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756"},"headline":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach","datePublished":"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/"},"wordCount":1323,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Business Strategy","Cost Reduction Strategies","Cost Reduction Strategy","Digital Strategy","Planning","Strategic Decision-Making","Strategic Planning","Strategy Planning"],"articleSection":["Strategy Planning"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/","name":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach - Cataligent","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-16T13:51:05+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T11:37:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/change-management-strategy-vs-ticket-sprawl\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Change Management Strategy vs Ticket Sprawl: A Real Approach"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/","name":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/","description":"Strategy Execution Tool for Cost Saving Program","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization","name":"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logoColored-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logoColored-1.png","width":296,"height":75,"caption":"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/","https:\/\/x.com\/cataligentindia","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/cataligentstrategy\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/cataligentindia\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756","name":"cat_admin_usr","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"cat_admin_usr"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/author\/cat_admin_usr\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}