{"id":16926,"date":"2026-04-23T04:59:54","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T23:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/"},"modified":"2026-06-17T06:13:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T13:13:05","slug":"common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/strategy-planning\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/","title":{"rendered":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Common Project Management Software Development Challenges<\/h1>\n<p>Project management software development becomes difficult when teams treat it as a feature build rather than an execution governance problem. The challenge is not only creating tasks, calendars, or dashboards. The challenge is building a system that supports how leaders control projects, portfolios, approvals, risks, dependencies, financial impact, and reporting.<\/p>\n<p>For enterprise PMOs, transformation offices, and consulting firms, project management software must work in complex operating environments. Different functions need different views. Executives need reliable roll up reporting. Finance needs planned versus actual visibility. Workstream owners need clarity on decisions, blockers, and ownership.<\/p>\n<p>That is why common project management software development challenges often come from governance design, data structure, workflow logic, and adoption, not from coding alone.<\/p>\n<h2>Challenge 1: unclear project hierarchy<\/h2>\n<p>A common challenge is weak hierarchy design. If the software cannot represent organization, portfolio, programme, project, package, and initiative level work clearly, reporting becomes difficult and manual consolidation returns.<\/p>\n<p>A PMO may need portfolio views for leadership, project views for managers, milestone views for delivery teams, and measure views for financial accountability. If these levels are mixed together, the software may collect data but fail to support decision making.<\/p>\n<p>The hierarchy should allow bottom up aggregation and top down control. This is essential for <a href=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/multi-project-management-solution\">multi project management<\/a>, where several projects depend on shared resources, budgets, and leadership decisions.<\/p>\n<h2>Challenge 2: task tracking without value tracking<\/h2>\n<p>Many systems are strong at tracking tasks but weak at tracking value. That creates a problem in transformation and cost programmes because leadership needs to know whether the project is delivering the expected business outcome, not only whether activities are complete.<\/p>\n<p>A project may appear green on milestones while the expected EBITDA contribution, cost saving target, cash flow effect, or benefit realization is slipping. Software development should therefore support separate views of implementation progress and potential value.<\/p>\n<p>This distinction helps executives decide whether to intervene, reforecast, change scope, or pause work before the issue becomes visible too late.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Budget versus actual tracking.<\/li>\n<li>Forecast value versus actual value.<\/li>\n<li>Milestone status and financial potential status.<\/li>\n<li>Benefit owner and finance validation.<\/li>\n<li>Closure evidence for value confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Challenge 3: approval workflows that do not match real governance<\/h2>\n<p>Approval workflows are often designed too simply. Real project environments require change request approvals, investment approvals, readiness approvals, implementation gates, escalation rules, and final closure checks.<\/p>\n<p>If the software cannot reflect these decision rights, teams return to email threads and meeting notes. The official system then becomes a partial record, while the real approval history sits outside the platform.<\/p>\n<p>Project management software development should define who can approve, who can request changes, what evidence is needed, when a decision moves work forward, and when work should be placed on hold or cancelled.<\/p>\n<h2>Challenge 4: reporting designed after the process<\/h2>\n<p>Reporting is often treated as the final layer. That creates problems because reports depend on the data model, status logic, workflow states, financial fields, and user discipline created earlier.<\/p>\n<p>A better approach is to design executive reporting and portfolio reporting before development decisions are locked. Leaders should define achievements, issues, decisions needed, next steps, risks, dependencies, financial effect, and closure criteria early.<\/p>\n<p>This reduces the risk of building a system that captures many fields but cannot produce a useful steering committee view.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Design leadership reports before finalizing fields.<\/li>\n<li>Define status language consistently.<\/li>\n<li>Separate risks from decisions needed.<\/li>\n<li>Make report exports traceable to source records.<\/li>\n<li>Avoid manual slide rebuilding as the normal reporting process.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Challenge 5: adoption gaps across business teams<\/h2>\n<p>Project management software is adopted when it matches how teams actually work and when users understand why their updates matter. A platform that feels like administration will be resisted. A platform that helps control execution will be used more consistently.<\/p>\n<p>Adoption also depends on access rights, role clarity, training, and useful dashboards. Executives, project managers, sponsors, controllers, and team members should each see what they need without being forced through irrelevant information.<\/p>\n<p>For consulting firms, adoption also depends on client confidence. The system should support the firm methodology while giving the client transparent reporting and clear ownership.<\/p>\n<h2>Why no code configuration can reduce development risk<\/h2>\n<p>One reason project management software development becomes difficult is that business requirements change as leaders see the system in use. A workflow that looked clear during design may need a different approval step. A report that looked useful may need a clearer value field. A hierarchy may need another level for programme governance.<\/p>\n<p>No code configuration can reduce this risk when it allows business flows, forms, fields, reports, and access rules to be adjusted without rebuilding the platform from the ground up. This does not remove the need for strong design. It makes the design easier to adapt as the operating model matures.<\/p>\n<p>For enterprise teams, configurability also supports adoption. Users are more likely to trust the platform when it reflects real responsibilities, reporting needs, and decision paths. For consulting firms, configurability helps embed a repeatable methodology across client mandates while still allowing client specific variation.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Configure fields around the governance model.<\/li>\n<li>Adjust reports as leadership questions change.<\/li>\n<li>Match access rights to real user roles.<\/li>\n<li>Support client specific workflows without rebuilding the method.<\/li>\n<li>Preserve one execution record while allowing process refinement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The cost of ignoring governance during development<\/h2>\n<p>Ignoring governance during development creates rework later. Teams may build fields that are rarely used, reports that do not answer leadership questions, or workflows that fail to capture real approval decisions. When that happens, users start working around the system.<\/p>\n<p>The cost is not only technical rework. It is loss of trust. Once leaders believe the platform is not the place where execution truth lives, they return to spreadsheets and meetings, and the software becomes another administrative layer rather than the operating system for projects.<\/p>\n<h2>How Cataligent Helps Through CAT4<\/h2>\n<p>Cataligent helps enterprises and consulting firms address project management software development challenges through CAT4, its no code strategy execution platform. CAT4 is not positioned as a generic task tracker. It is designed to support governed transformation execution, project portfolio governance, approvals, financial impact tracking, dashboards, and executive reporting.<\/p>\n<p>Through CAT4, teams can configure portfolios, programmes, projects, measure packages, and measures, while tracking owners, sponsors, controllers, risks, dependencies, financials, workflows, Implementation Status, and Potential Status. This helps connect project activity with business impact.<\/p>\n<p>Cataligent brings configuration guidance, CAT4 customization, and consulting awareness to help match the platform to the operating model. For broader project and portfolio needs, Cataligent supports <a href=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/multi-project-management-solution\">project portfolio management<\/a> and transformation governance through one controlled platform.<\/p>\n<h2>A practical next step<\/h2>\n<p>If your project management software effort is becoming a feature list, step back and define the governance model first. Cataligent can help you configure CAT4 around the hierarchy, workflows, financial tracking, approvals, and reports needed to manage execution with control.<\/p>\n<h2>FAQs<\/h2>\n<h3>Q. What is the biggest project management software development challenge?<\/h3>\n<p>The biggest challenge is often governance design, not task tracking. The software must reflect hierarchy, ownership, approvals, financial impact, reporting, and closure rules.<\/p>\n<h3>Q. Why do project dashboards fail to support leadership decisions?<\/h3>\n<p>Dashboards fail when the underlying data is not governed or when status logic is inconsistent. Leaders need source controlled records for risks, dependencies, financial impact, decisions needed, and project closure.<\/p>\n<h3>Q. How does Cataligent help address these challenges through CAT4?<\/h3>\n<p>Cataligent helps configure CAT4 around the client operating model, project hierarchy, workflow approvals, financial tracking, and executive reporting needs. CAT4 provides the platform layer for governed project and portfolio execution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Common Project Management Software Development Challenges Project management software development becomes difficult when teams treat it as a feature build rather than an execution governance problem. The challenge is not only creating tasks, calendars, or dashboards. The challenge is building a system that supports how leaders control projects, portfolios, approvals, risks, dependencies, financial impact, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2104],"tags":[2033,568,632,1739,2107,1967,2106,2105],"class_list":["post-16926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-strategy-planning","tag-business-strategy","tag-cost-reduction-strategies","tag-cost-reduction-strategy","tag-digital-strategy","tag-planning","tag-strategic-decision-making","tag-strategic-planning","tag-strategy-planning"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges Project management software development becomes difficult when teams treat it as a feature build rather than an execution governance problem. The challenge is not only creating tasks, calendars, or dashboards. The challenge is building a system that supports how leaders control projects, portfolios, approvals, risks, dependencies, financial impact, and [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cataligent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"cat_admin_usr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cataligentindia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cataligentindia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"cat_admin_usr\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"cat_admin_usr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756\"},\"headline\":\"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1245,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Business Strategy\",\"Cost Reduction Strategies\",\"Cost Reduction Strategy\",\"Digital Strategy\",\"Planning\",\"Strategic Decision-Making\",\"Strategic Planning\",\"Strategy Planning\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Strategy Planning\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/\",\"name\":\"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/uncategorized\\\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/\",\"description\":\"Strategy Execution Tool for Cost Saving Program\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/01\\\/logoColored-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/01\\\/logoColored-1.png\",\"width\":296,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cataligentindia\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/cataligentstrategy\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/cataligentindia\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756\",\"name\":\"cat_admin_usr\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"cat_admin_usr\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cataligent.in\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/cat_admin_usr\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent","og_description":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges Project management software development becomes difficult when teams treat it as a feature build rather than an execution governance problem. The challenge is not only creating tasks, calendars, or dashboards. The challenge is building a system that supports how leaders control projects, portfolios, approvals, risks, dependencies, financial impact, and [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/","og_site_name":"Cataligent","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00","author":"cat_admin_usr","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@cataligentindia","twitter_site":"@cataligentindia","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"cat_admin_usr","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/"},"author":{"name":"cat_admin_usr","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756"},"headline":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges","datePublished":"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/"},"wordCount":1245,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Business Strategy","Cost Reduction Strategies","Cost Reduction Strategy","Digital Strategy","Planning","Strategic Decision-Making","Strategic Planning","Strategy Planning"],"articleSection":["Strategy Planning"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/","name":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges - Cataligent","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T23:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-17T13:13:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/uncategorized\/common-project-management-software-development-challenges-in-resource-planning\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Common Project Management Software Development Challenges"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/","name":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/","description":"Strategy Execution Tool for Cost Saving Program","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#organization","name":"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd.","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logoColored-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/logoColored-1.png","width":296,"height":75,"caption":"Cataligent Project Pvt. Ltd."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Cataligentstrategyimplementation\/","https:\/\/x.com\/cataligentindia","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/cataligentstrategy\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/cataligentindia\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/649c37d6027e076e1e76bd18bac05756","name":"cat_admin_usr","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5a61f472589fc237202ca132bc60e152f3e6a99196f2e24dcf2a5f01626f1b4a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"cat_admin_usr"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/author\/cat_admin_usr\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16926\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cataligent.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}